
Arsonists have hit two European ground stations that link Starlink's satellites to the internet: in Poland on September 23 and near Sofia, Bulgaria, on October 9. Ukraine's armed forces depend on Starlink. Poland says Russian intelligence ordered its attack and has had four people detained in Germany; a Sofia court has issued European arrest warrants for two German citizens charged in absentia, but Bulgaria has not tied the attack to any state (AP; DW). This page tracks what is confirmed, who is claiming what, and what evidence would settle it.
This tracker closed on October 22, 2026. The Starlink attacks are part of a wider run of sabotage across Europe that four governments now blame on Russia. We follow them all on Is Russia Waging Hybrid War on Europe?
What the evidence shows
What would reopen it
Closed trackers reflect our provisional conclusion. We may reopen this one at any time if our editors see that new information has become available. The page and its sources stay online as a record.
Arsonists have hit Starlink ground stations in Poland (September 23) and near Sofia (October 9). Polish prosecutors cite “reasonable suspicion” that Russian services ordered the Polish attack, ministers say they have “no doubt,” and four people have been detained in Germany. But no evidence of a Russian link has been published, and no one has been charged in the Polish case. Bulgaria has charged two German citizens in absentia and issued European arrest warrants, but has not named any state behind the attack.
What would change this rating ↓
starlinksabotage.america2.newsAnalysis of Russian influence, information warfare and the networks behind them. Free; unsubscribe anytime.
New reporting from major outlets and official sources, listed as it appears. Our monitoring adds headlines from major outlets automatically. "Checked" means our software fetched the full report and confirmed it supports its headline. "Reviewed" means an editor checked it against its source. "Auto" items have not been checked yet. Tap a label for our note. None of this is an endorsement. Our assessment is the rating above.
The rating measures how well the claim that Russia is behind these attacks is supported by evidence, not how plausible it seems. Any one of these would move it.
The most-shared claims, and what public sources can confirm.
Origin. Bulgarian outlets citing unnamed prosecution sources (Sega).
What the evidence shows. No named official has confirmed any arrest. Radev and the security agency have said only that the investigation is under way (Sofia Globe).
Bottom line. Partly confirmed: a Sofia court issued European arrest warrants for two German citizens on Oct. 19; no arrest has been reported (AP; DW).
Origin. Headlines on October 12–13 after Polish ministers named Russia.
What the evidence shows. Prosecutors cite “reasonable suspicion,” and ministers say they have “no doubt” (Al Jazeera). Police say they hold movement records, recordings, fingerprints and DNA on the suspects (Notes from Poland), but nothing tying them to a Russian service has been published, and no charges have been filed.
Bottom line. An official attribution, not yet a proven one.
Origin. Media reports that investigators are examining a possible link.
What the evidence shows. No Polish or Bulgarian official has said the cases are connected.
Bottom line. Possible, not established.
Origin. Polish, Lithuanian and Bulgarian officials.
What the evidence shows. Polish prosecutors say the aim was to disrupt Starlink in Poland and other Central and Eastern European countries (PAP). Lithuania’s foreign minister says the purpose was “to undermine a capability critical to Ukraine’s defence” (X: Budrys); its crisis chief says “Ukraine is the target” (Reuters). So far the damage is small: the Polish station kept operating (The Local), the Lithuanian antennas did not catch fire, and the crisis chief noted that other such stations exist (Delfi/ELTA). Low-cost physical attacks using hired criminals fit the wider pattern of Russia-linked sabotage in Europe (Al Jazeera).
Bottom line. The stated aim of the officials naming Russia. The effect on service so far appears limited.
Origin. Posts on X after the Lithuanian attempt (X), and the logic of Russia’s own public statements.
What the evidence shows. Prominent Russian voices have treated Musk, not Washington, as the person who decides what Starlink does. In August Konstantin Malofeev, the owner of Tsargrad, wrote that “it is not hard to put pressure on Musk.” He quoted the Russian official Sergey Glazyev calling for cutting communications “on land and on the seabed” as well as disabling Starlink’s satellites, and he described SpaceX’s investors as backers of the war against Russia (Tsargrad, archived; our translation). In September the Kremlin’s spokesman called letting Ukraine use Musk’s systems for deep strikes “very harmful, potentially dangerous and reckless” (Interfax). Musk says the US government controls Ukraine’s military service, but the Wall Street Journal, citing US officials, reports that Musk himself ordered the October slowdown (WSJ); the Telegraph had reported that he proposed it to President Trump (Kyiv Independent). No official has tied the arsons to a demand on SpaceX, and SpaceX has not commented.
Bottom line. If Russia is behind the attacks, pressure on SpaceX is a logical motive. No document shows it yet.
Origin. Social-media posts.
What the evidence shows. The Polish station kept operating after the fire (The Local). No outage has been reported from either site. The restrictions Ukraine's forces hit on October 13–14 were speed limits set on SpaceX's side, a separate story (our Starlink tracker).
Bottom line. No evidence of an outage from these attacks.